This week's reading focused primarily on the fundamentals of tutoring and how to tutor effectively. Such a responsibility includes being on task and interested in the material you as a tutor are trying to teach, as well as practicing active listening as a means to facilitate better communication. There are many steps that go into being an effective tutor, such as being ethical, professional, and flexible with those you are tutoring, but a tutor must also be willing to learn on the job as there will always be situations with which you may have no or little experience. In these cases, using what you know as a tutor to adapt and advise is the best you can do. However, it would be best for a tutor to avoid using a corrective style because while this may be useful in the short term, the tutee learns much less as a result of trying to handle their paper quickly. Instead a tutor must take the time to hear their troubles and difficulties and then present a solution through carefully considered feedback and specific examples. This chapter provides a significant amount of insight for those seeking the basic principles of tutoring. As a result, I found it quite informative, providing a great deal of information and things to look for as a tutor as well as perform while fulfilling that role. My only question then is why so many teachers adopt this "red-pen" correction mindset of teaching if a collaborative method is so superior to a student's learning?
Tuesday: September 10th
A Political History of Digital Humanities: This reading, like past readings, seemed to focus on defining what Digital Humanities both is and is not. Digital Humanities prefers lab based research and digital projects to over reading and writing when it comes to studying the humanities. The article also focused extensively on the onset of computers in scholarly learning, the creation of "computer specialists" who were mostly librarians, and their poor worth in the eyes of literary scholars. Jerome McGann and his Rossetti project are mentioned, as well as the necessity of computers in compiling the data required. And in the face of all of this, Digital Humanities is created from the anger and disdain carried by growing Digital Humanists as literary scholars looked down on them. The Scandal of Digital Humanities: The article was about how people seemed to think that Digital Humanities represented and encouraged Neoliberalism. The aut...
Comments
Post a Comment